Mizo Literary Criticism |obul Leh
Hmasawn Chhoh Dan Leh Mizo Literary Criticism-a Zikpuii pa, Siamkima Khawlhring
Leh J.F.Laldailova Te Pawimawhna
I.
Sawihawnna :
Thu
leh hla huangah hian hmanlai ata tawh fakselna lam hawia mi thu leh hla lo sep
rawtuina leh lo sawiselna hi thil chin \han tak pakhat a ni \hin a. Kum BC 4-na
lai vel khan Greek mifing leh mithiam Aristotle lehkhabu ziah ropui tak
‘Poetics’ tih chhuah niin, chu lehkhabu chuan thu leh hla kalphung hrang hrang
a tarlang a. He lehkhabu-a thu inziak thu leh hla peng hrang hrang hrilhfiahna
leh kalphung awmze neia duan hi Criticism bul in\anna a ngaih a ni.
Khawvel hmun hrang
hrang ah mi thu leh hla buaipui leh hetiang fakselna lam lo tuipui hi tam tak
an awm tawh a, chung zingah chuan Longinus te, Horrace te, Boileau te, Sainte
Beuve te, English mi Johnson leh Mathew Arnold te, Baumgarten te, Goethe te,
Edgar Allan poe leh Memerson te hi khawvel hriatah hial an hming alar phah a ni.
II.
Criticism Awmzia :
Criticism
hi Greek \awng ‘krinaw’ leh ‘Kritikos’ tih a\anga lak a ni a, ‘Krinaw’ tih
awmzia chu ‘To judge’ (endik) tihna a ni a. ‘Kritikos’ chu ‘Judgement’
(ngaihdan sawina) tihna a ni.
J.F
Laldailova English-Mizo Dictionary ah chuan Criticism tih chu ‘Chik taka thil
endikna,sawiselna’ tiin tarlan a ni a. (J.F Dictionary, 126)
Criticism
hian huang zau tak erawh a nei a, mi thuziak emaw kutchhuak sawisel leh dik lo
lai hailan ringawt hi Criticism nihna a ni chiah lova, Criticism chuan thu leh
hla te a nihdan tur ang takin a kal em tih piah lamah a \hatna lai a fak
thiamin a \hat lohna laiah thurawn a pe thiam tur a ni. Criticism lama bul lo
\antu Aristotle chuan Criticism chu “Uluk taka thu tih tlukna” (a standard of
judging well) tiin a lo sawifiah a, hei hi Criticism sawifiahna awlsam tak
pakhat chu a ni.
TS Elliot chuan,
“Criticism chu mi thu leh hla ziak chhui a, ziak ve veka a \ha leh \ha lo laite
tarlan a, comment kan siam vena hi a ni” a ti bawk. (H.Laldinmawia, 317)
III.
Mizo Literary Criticism |obul:
Mizote’n
ziak leh chhiar kan thiam har avangin thu leh hla huanga Criticism lamah hian a
kum chhut chuan naupang viau mah ilangin heti lam hawi zawnga thuziah hrim hrim
chu Kum 1912-a Bible-a Chanchin |ha an lehlin tharna ah an lehlin hmasa zawk
\hat tawk loh dan te tarlan a nih avangin, he Bible (Thuthlung Thar) hi helam
hawi inziakna hmasa ber a tih theih anga, amaherawh chu Thu leh hla huanga
Literary Criticism kan neih leh kan pawm theih hmasa bera lang chu Zikpuii pa
thu leh hla te hi an ni thung.
Prof.Siamkima
chuan a lehkhabu ‘Zalenna Ram’-a a insawi danin criticism ah pawh Book review
hi a khawih hmasak ber a ni a, Kum 1973 ah bul \anin R.Vanlawma lehkhabu ‘Ka
Ram leh Kei’ tih chu MZP Chanchinbu-a chhuah turin a review a, hei hi Mizo
\awnga Book review kan neih hmasa ber nia hriat a nih thu a sawi bawk a.
(Siamkima Khawlhring, 168)
Hetih
lai hian Kohhran chanchinbu ‘Didakhe’ issue hmasa berah chuan Rev.Beiseia’n kum
1972 khan Book review alo nei tawh a. A lehkhabu review hmasak ber chu
‘Kristian chhungkua’ tih Leslie & Winifred Brown ziak, H.K.L Thanga leh
Rev.C.Paz^wna lehlin leh ‘Kohhran pianhmang leh a Kohna’ Rev.William Steward
ziah, Rev.P.D. Sena lehlin a ni nghe nghe. He chanchinbu Didakhe ah hian
lehkhabu review-na huang siamin theih tawpin \an an lo la \hin a ni.
Hetiang
a nih takah chuan Book review tihmasatu leh chingchhuaktu chungchang chu
inhnial theih tak a lo nih phah a. Prof.Siamkima’n ama chin chhuah nia a sawi
lai hian Rev.Beiseia hi a tihmasatu zawk a ni maiin alang thei. Amaherawhchu an
thuziak te kan thlir erawh chuan inhnial theih takin an thuziak dan kalphung hi
a danglam hle a. Kristian Chhungkua review-na te hi phek khat lek a nih bakah
fakna lam thu chauh inziahna a ni a. Hengte avang hian a hmasa zawka lang hi
Criticism puitlinga chhiar theih a ni lo maithei bawk.
Thu
leh hla lama hriat hlawh tak C.Lalsiamthanga chuan he fakselna huangah hi chuan
Pastor Vanchhunga thuziak 1954 (Published year 1955) hi a hmasa ber-a a pawm
thu a sawi a, chutih laiin hemi kum (1954) ah vek hian Zikpuii pa (K.C.
Lalvunga) chuan duhtuina lam thuziak tho lehkhabu pakhat a tichhuak a. Book
review tih lovah chuan he mite pahnih thu leh hla hi criticism lama Mizoten kan
hmelhriat hmasak pawl tak an ni bawk.
Thu
leh hla chikna huangchhungah hian tunhma lamah chuan Lehkhabu ennawnna leh
chikna (Book review) hi an tuipui ber a ni a tih theih a. Siamkima bakah hian
mi tam takin lehkhabu review hi an nei \hin. Amaherawhchu criticism kan
hmelhriatna ala rei loh em avangin \henkhat chuan sawiselna ringawt emaw ti
tawk te an lo awm chawk a, hei vang hian Lehkhabu ziaktu lam rilru tihnat tak
mai te pawh an awm nawk bawk.
Book
review hi ‘Thu leh Hla’ chanchinbu te, Kohhran chanchinbu ‘Didakhe’ ah te hmuh
tur tam tak a awm \hin a. Chung zingah chuan
kan sawi tak bakah hian Pu.Sangliana te, Prof.Lianhleia te, R.Vanlawma
te, Rev.Zalawma te leh Ngurchhawna te hi a hmasa pawl tak niin an lang a. Tin,
kan tarlan loh zingah pawh mi tam tak an awmin a rinawm bawk.
Engpawh nise Mizo
Literary Criticism chuan kan hranghluite lakah pawh hnuhma alo hnutchhiah ve
nasa hle tih a hriat theih a. Thuziah huang chhung bik ngawr ngawra kan chhui
dawn chuan Kristian Tlangau-a chhuak Bible chhutnawn a nih chhan sawina
chungchang hi criticism lam hawi hmasa ber a tih theih a, chuti ni lova zirna
lampang leh khawvel huapa Literary criticism an pawm dan kalhmanga kan chik a
nih thung chuan Zikpuii pa hi Mizo literary criticism bul \antu tiin a sawi
theih a ni.
IV.
Hmasawnna :
Hetianga
thu leh hla thlirna leh fakselna kan lo chin chhoh takah chuan kan lehkhathiam
hmasa te khan an theih ang leh thiam ang tawkin thu leh hla fakselna hi an lo
tuipui chhunzawm ve nghal a. Chutih lai erawh chuan mi thu leh hla pahnih khat
lo s>p-a bansan zui leh ta pawh an awm nuk bawk.
Kan
sulsute zingah pawh an kutchhuak azira hmasawn chho zel an awm a. Didakhe
chanchinbu-a book review kan hmuh tam tak pawhin hma a sawn zel a, 1974 –a
chhuak ‘Lal Isua Chanchin A Len Lai Nite’ tih C.Rokhuma ziah Rev.Beiseia’n a
review te hi chu chhiar tlak tak an ni tawh a. 1979 chhova C.Sangzual Book
review te pawh hi an \ha tawh hle a tih theih ang. Hetih hunlai chhovah hi
chuan Prof.Siamkima Khawlhring hi sawihmaih theih a ni lova, a ni hi chuan thu
leh hla hrang hrang a review \hin a, a hunlai ngaihtuah phei chuan a kutchhuak
te hi belhchian dawl tak an ni.
Heng
kan tarlan bakah hian Remkunga te, R.Lalrawna te, Lalzuia Colney te, Thanpuii pa te, R.Vanlaawma te,
C.Lalsiamthanga te, Lalchungnunga te, C.Lalramzauva te J.F.Laldailova te pawh
hi sawi hmaih theih an ni lo bawk.
Tin
kun 1990 hnulam ah pawh criticism lam hawia thuziak a awm chho ve zel a,
B.Lalthangliana te, Prof.Laltluangliana Khiangte te, Prof.R.L. Thanmawia te,
Darchuailova Renthlei te, R.Lal\hazuala te, Lalsangzuali sailo te, L.keivom te
leh H.Lalrinfela te pawh an lo lang chho ve zel a, heng mite kutchhuak han
thlir phei hi chuan criticism kan neih tirh ai khan hmasawnna a tamin an
ziahdan kalphung pawh a danglam tawh hle tih a hriat theih. Technique hrang
hrang hmanga thlira lo thliar thiam an ni deuh fur tawh a, an kutchhuak hian
belhchian a dawl hlawm hle.
An
ni bakah hian tunhnu deuhah C.Lalawmpuia Vanchiau pawh hi sawi hmaih theih a ni
lova. Ani hi mizoten tuna critics kan neih zingah chuan lehkhathiam a nih bakah
a thu leh hla te hian zirchian an dawlin chik an dawl em em a ni.
Kan tarlan bakah
hian mi tam tak, chanchinbu leh lehkhabu hrang hranga mi thu leh hla lo s>p
\hin an awm a, sawi vek sen an ni lovang. Engpawh nise mizo ten thu leh hla kan
neih ngaihtuahin kan zirchian dan pawh a ramri pel thluak tawh hle tih a hriat
theih a, tehna leh zina hrang hrang behchhana thu leh hla zirchian pawh kan
thiam tawh hle bawk a, hmasawnna ropui tak niin a hriat a ni.
V.
Zikpuii Pa :
Zikpuii
Pa tia hriat l^r hi a hming tak chu K.C. Lalvunga a ni a, apa chu Hrawva niin
anu chu Lalluii a ni. Kum 1929 December 27 ah apiang a, khiangte hnam a ni. Kum
1953 ah B.A a zova, 1962 ah IFS (Indian
Foreign Service) a zawm a, mizo zinga Indian Ambassador puitling hmasa ber niin
khawvel hmun hrang hrangah a awm kual a ni. Ram tana mi \angkai tak a nih laiin
kum 1994, October 10 ah a boral ta mai a ni.
Zikpuii
pa tia hriat l^r K.C. Lalvunga hian a thuziak reng rengah zikpuii pa tia a
indah \hin avangin Zikpuii pa tia sawi vek a nih phah a.
Thu
leh hla lama mi inhmang tak leh lehkhathiam hmasa nia ram tana \hahnem ngai em
em a ni a. Politics lam thlengin a veiin a tuipui em em \hin. Zikpuii pa hian
essay te, novel te a ziak nasa in hla pawh a phuah tam hle a. A thuziah tam tak
hi zir tham leh ngaihnawm tak an ni hlawm bawk. Tin mizo zingah chuan criticism
lam luhchilh hmasa ber a ni bawk a, a kutchhuak te hi ram leh hnam tan an
\angkaiin an hlu hle mai.
Kan
sawi tawh angin Zikpuii pa hian Kum 1954 daih tawh khan ‘Lushai Literature’ tih
hmangin Criticism bul alo \an tawh a, Mizo zingah chuan Criticism lam hawi ziak
hmasa ber a ni. A thil thlir ber pawh Mizo pi le pute thu leh hla an ni a.
Theory lama kan thlir chuan Zikpuii pa hi Historical critics te, Comparative
critics te leh Pragmatic critics niin a hriat.
Criticism
lam hawia a thuziah te hi a ziah hunlai mai ni lovin tun hnu thleng hian
thuziak \ha an la ni phak tlat a. Zosapthara hla a thlirna han en phei hi chuan
Literature theory chungchang Zikpuii pa hian a hre hle niin alang bawk.
“Zosapthara hi hmanlai
literature leh tunlai literature in\henna lai vel hunah a ramri lung pawimawh
berte zinga pakhat a ni. Fakna hla siamah leh Mizo \awng thu (prose) ziakah
entawn tur reng reng a hun hmain a awm lova, khawthiama kawng zawng chawp a ni
a, chu chu sincere taka literary critics nih tum tan chuan hriat a pawimawh
fovin ka ring” (Zikpuii Pa,157)
a han ti te hian
literature-a inhmangte thu leh hla kan zirchian kawnga an hunlai boruak leh an
material ngaihtuah tel a \ul zia a tilang chiang em em a, hei hian Historical
critics a nih zia a hailang thei ang.
Chutih
rual erawhin he Zosapthara hla thlirna tih a ziah ah tho hian “Zosapthara hian
Poem a ziak lova ‘hymn’ a ziak a ni..” a han ti te, “Gramatical Rules-a verse
kan the dawn chuan a tla hmasa ber tur chu Shakespeare-a a ni a. Finite verb a
tel lo tih mai mai te hi hla tehna dik a ni ngai lo” a han tih te leh “Poetry
hi Prose standard leh gramatical rules-a the hi kumkhaw thuah a dik ngai lo” a
han ti te hian Literary theory phenah mihring rilru hnehna a hriat chian zia a
tihlan theih avangin Pragmatics critics leh Evaluative critics a nih zia a
tarlang thei bawk a ni.
A
tlangpui thuin Zikpuii pa hian thuziak leh hla te hi a Literaty base ai chuan
mihring rilru a hneh danah a the \hin a. Grammatical form ai chuan rilru
chhungril a hnehna lam hi a chawinung zawk zelin alang. Hetih lai hian \hahnem
erawh angai thei hle a, kan hla thu hman leh kan hla hawi zawng te chu thlak
danglam a hun tawh zia te, mahni ramri pela hnam dangte tan pawha lunglen
theihna kan phuah a hun ve tawh zia te a sawi tel bawk.
Rokunga
hla a thlirna ah te hian “Hla phuah thiamte hla zawng zawng hi a mawi vek kher
lem lova, a chhe lai hlir kan inthlur sak chuan tu hla phuahthiam mah hian
chawhelh an dawl bik lovang” (Zikpuii pa, 148) a han ti te hian Hla hi a
phuahtu ngawta innghat a nih loh zia a tarlang chiangin hla phuahtute dinhmun a
hrechiang hlein a hriat a. Tin, hla mawi bik leh nalh bik erawh a awm a ni tih
a sawi mawi thiam em em a ni.
Mi
sawisel an \ul chuan Zikpuii pa hian a dim lem lo hle a, J.F. Laldailova thil
thlir dan pawh dik tawk lova a hriat avangin a sawisel mai a, chutih lai erawh
chuan thlir dan tur dik nia a hriat a kawhhmuh nghal zel bawk a ni. Hei vang
hian Zikpuii pa hi Critics \ha tak a tih loh theih lovang.
Zikpuii
pa hian Criticism nihphung hi a hrechiang hle in a hriat. Phuahchawp hi
literature ah chuan thudik hnualsuatna lam a ni lo tih a hriat chian avangin
mihring nun in a laichin chu eng anga phuah chhuah pawh nise pawm thiam a\ul
zia Rokunga hla a thlirna ah sawiin “Kan Zotlang ram nuam hi Chhawrpial run i
inag e’ tih hla-a Chhawrpial run hi hmun nuam sawinan kan hmang ngai lo a nih
pawhin hmun nuam kan mitthla theih avangin a mawi mai a ni” a han ti te hian
Zikpuii pa thil thlir thiam zia a lanchian tir hle a ni.
Book
review lamah pawh Zikpuii pa hi thil thlir thiam tak mai leh tehkhin nana
thuhman thiam tak a ni a. Hei hian Comparative critics a nihna a pholang thei
bawk ang. ‘Lehkhabu ramtiam’ a thlirna leh ‘Ka Lungkham’ a thlirna tlanga han
din pawh hian Compare thiam tak nia comparative critics \ha a nih zia chu alang
chiang em em a, a thuziak hmasa lama a duhthawh luata kan hla phuah thiam
Rokunga meuh pawh Ramri pel lo tia chhuah hialtu Zikpuii pa hian khawvel huapa
mi l^r pha Montesquieu leh Adam Smith te kutchhuak te, Charles Darwin leh
Milton-a Paradise Lost hial te lo chulmam tawhtu a nihna chhut chian erawh
chuan a duh thawhna hi a hriat thiampui theih hle thung mai.
Engpawh
nise thu leh hla huangah Zikpuii pa hian Nopui a dawm hneh hle a tih theih a,
kutchhuak a neih tam danah te hian a creative zia a hriat theih. Chu mai piah
lamah critical writing nei hmasa a nihna hian mizo literary criticism huang
chhungah hmun pawimawh aluah reng dawn a. Eng emaw chungchangah a thu hi inkalh
awm deuh zauh zauh \hin mahsela Dr.K.C. Vannghaka’n
“K.C Lalvunga kha a
hranpa chuan ka hmuin ka kawm hauh lova. A thusawi pawh ka hre bawk lova. Amah
kawm chiangtute \awngkama ka hriat danin a vawikhat ziak kha siam \ha chuang
lovin a ring nghal mai niawm tak a ni a….. Hetiang mi hi mi danglam, talent nei
\ha tak an ni. Amaherawh chu uluk taka mahni thuziak thlir nawn leh \hinte ai
chuan tiihsual palh emaw, duhthusam lo lai eawm an kut hnuah hian hmuh tur a
tam zawkin a lang” (Literature Zungzam,94)
a alo tih ang hian mahni thuziak siam
nawn leh ngai mang lo a nihna vang hian a kuthnu ah pawr lai a awm ve zeuh zeuh
\hin niin a lang a ni. Hetiang a nih lai hian thu leh hla khawvel mite thlir
dana thlir hmasa bertu leh a hmasa mah nisela tun hnu thleng pawha thuziak hlu
leh belh tlak ziaktu, novelist le poet ni pah fawma Critics \ha tak Mizo zinga
awm Zikpuii pa, K.C Lalvunga hi Mizo Literary Criticism huang chhungah hian a
nung reng dawn a ni.
VI.
Siamkima Khawlhring :
Book
review kawnga Mizo te tana kawng sat >ngtu Prof. Siamkima Khawlhring hian
lehkhabu pathum lek min hnutchhiah mahse mizo literature ah hmunlum pawimawh a
luah reng tho dawn a nih ber hi maw. A lehkhabu pakhat ‘Zalenna Ram’ tluka
hriat leh chhiar hlawh hi mizo fa te kutchhuak zingah an awm kher lovang.
Critics
rilru dik tak pua kawng sattu hian criticism nihphung dik tak a hrechiangin mi
kutchhuak a thlir thiam hle a, tunlaia an sawi lar tak hluai leh Criticism
kalphung thar nia an sawi ‘death of the author/The creative role of the reader’
tih pawh hi Kum zabi 20-na ah khan Siamkima hian alo luhchilh daih tawh a lo
ni.
A
hunlai hian Book review an intih hmuh emaw tih turin creative writing chu sawi
loh, lehlin bu te nen lam an review sup sup a, chutiang karah chuan tuman
review dan dika an review lova a hriat vang nge ni MZP chanchinbu ah Book
review ti hmasa bertu nia a inhriat thu a sawi mauh mai.
A
ni reng taka criticism hian nihphung a nei a, a hunlaia review-tu tam tak khan
a ziaktu lam an thlur bing vak bakah a \hente phei chuan chaw tui lo khawpin an
lehkhabu review te an fak \hin. Siamkima erawh hi chuan buk lung dik tak khaiin
an thuziak te chu inmil takina buk a, a thlifim \hin.
Book
review lamah chauh pawh ni lovin Lungthu pathum a sawi a\ang ringawt pawh hian
an kutchhuak hmanga hla phuahtute rilru a hriat theih zia chu a tarlang chiang
hle. Patea, Saihnuna leh R.L Kamlala te kutchhuak a zirchianna hmangin hla
phuahtute mit hmangin khawvel min thlir tir a. He khawvel hi an mitah chuan
lungngaihna ram chauh niin lang mahsela Amah siamkima vek in Thomas Hardya’n,
“L^wmna hi zawng he khawvel natna leh lungngaihna ramah hian a chang changa lo
lang ve zauh zauh a ni e,” tia a lo sawi leh PB Shelleya’n,”Kan hla sak tui ber
berte chu lungngaihna lam hlate a ni \hin” ti a a lo sawite avang hian mittui
nena khawv>l an thlirna ruamah heng hla phuahtute hi an mal \an lo tih min
hriattir leh thei te hian Critics inchhiar zau tak leh Comparative tak a nih
zia a thai lang chiang em em a ni.
Siamkima
hian literature nihphung a hrechiang em em a, “Thu leh hla \ha chu laimu kheh
chhuah tur awm a ni tur a ni” tia alo sawi ang hian criticism huang chhunga a
zirchiante thu leh hla chi a chik hneh thei hle a, Prof. R.L Thanmawia phei
chuan “Tui liluh thiamten tuipui mawnga tuikeplung mawi an la chhuak ang mai hian
mi naranin kan hriatthiam theih turin a pho chhuak thiam a ni” ti hialin a fak
nghe nghe a ni.
Eng
pawh nise Prof. Siamkima Khawlhring hi thu leh hla huangah leh Mizo Literary
criticism huangah chuan sulsutu pawimawh tak a tih loh theih lova. A thu leh
hla thlirdan lai tak leh a thlir thiam dan ril tak chhut phei hi chuan Father
of Mizo Critics pek tlak hial a niin alang thei.
A
thu leh hla thlir te hi chik taka a enkual bakah midang kutchhuak leh hnamdang
kutchhuak nen a tehkhin thiam em em a, tin a ziaktu rilru a thlir thiamin an
thuziah leh hlaphuah laia an rilru a sawi chhuak thiam a. Chumi piah lamah
chutiang rilru an put tak mai dan te pawh ala chhutchhuak thiam ta cheu hi a
ropuina pakhat a ni.
Khawvelah a damlai
kum chhiar tam lo mahse Thu leh hla \ha-a khehchhuah tur zawngtu leh zawng
thiam em em Siamkima khawlhring hi Mizo literary citicism huanga mi pawimawh a
ni kumkhua ang.
VII.
J.F. Laldailova
Mizo
fate zinga English leh Mizo \awng thiam ber nia an sawi hial \hin Joseph
Francis Laldailova (J.F. Laldailova) hi retheih vanga Sap hnuaia seilian chung
sia mahni hnam hmangaih em em leh mahni ram tana theih tawp chhuahtu, thu leh
hla lamah phei chuan mi hmasa leh \awngkam bungrua thiam em em a ni a. Chu ai
mahin grammer a thiamna pawh hi hrilfak tham a tling a ni.
A
damlai hun chhiar rei lo mahse chanchinbu enkawl a thu leh hla lama \hahnem
ngai tak leh khawvel \awng zawng zawnga Mizo \awng dahsanga mawi ber titu ngat
a ni a, a thu leh hla leh kutchhuak te lah hian Mizo literature an tihausa hle
bawk.
Thuziak
panngai leh lehlin piahlamah thil chikmi leh critics a nihna hi kan hnam tan
chuan chenfak awm tak a ni. A vanglai hunah lam\ang nei tlem viau mah sela
khawvel hnamdangte laka mizona dah hniam phal lotu hian hluttu a ngah tulh tulh
dawn ni pawhin alang.
A
thu leh hla zirchian te hi a tlangpui thuin grammatic leh textual error te an
ni hlawm a. Mizote zinga Kristiannain hla thar tam tak, thluk mak tak tak leh
hla thu mak tak tak, mam si lo, inla mar si lo te leh Bible thu meuh atana iai
awm khawpa thuchheh mawi lo nia a hriatte sawisel a, siam\hat dan tur
kawhhmuhtu pawimawh tak a ni.
Sawi
tawh angin J.F-a thil thlir dan hi Evaluate bakah Ontological critics thlir dan
dik tak mai a ni a, a hunlai boruak leh thil neihte lam ai mahin an uluk lohna
leh an fimkhur lohna avanga an tihsual te hailanga siam \hat dan tur mawihnai
tak kawh hmuh \hin a ni.
Kan
Zosap ten hla thu mak leh ulh pui pui, mizo hla rinrawl bera an lo hmang chu na
a ti a, hlathu leh hlarua tam tak kan neih laia Pathian fak nan meuha \awng
tluang lutuk leh ulh bawk si kan hmang te hi a hriat thiam loh chu a ni. Tin,
Bible lehlin thuah pawh Mizo pa ngeiin \awngkam mawi thlang lova ulh tak taka
an letling \hin chu hriat thiam har a ti a. A \hahnem ngaihna hi mizo tan chuan
hlu tak a ni.
Grammar
lamah khawvel dangte angin thiam lo mah ila, kan neih chhun chu kan zahin kan
tidik tur a ni tih chu a thupui ber an ni fan a, hei vang hian Sap ho kan
ngaihsanna pawh dah \hat mai a\ul zia a tarlang nghal bawk a. Nimahsela JF-a
\hahnem ngaihdan hi an hrethiam tawk \hin lo fo bawk si a ni.
JF-a
chuan Sap hrim hrim huat lam hi a thupui a ni lova, thiam leh thiam lova hla an
phuah ve mai te, mizo hlathu leh \awngkam mawi tam tak a awm laia thu ulh leh
mawi lo, dik si lova an hman \hin te chu a vei a ni chauh zawk a. A thlirna
mita thlir chuan heng a sawisel te hian mizo thu leh hla an tibawrhbang hle ni
pawhin a hriat theih hial a ni.
Hetiang
taka thu leh hla ziahdan dik leh \awngkam dik leh mawi a buaipui avang hian a
pawng ataka Sap kan ngaisang ringawt leh Sap thu leh hla a nih avanga kan
dahsang ringawt chu \ha a tih loh zia a tlangau pui a, hemi thuah lah hian lo
ngai hawtu an awm zel bawk si.
Chutih
rual erawh chuan language leh grammar lama Mizo tana a\hahnem ngaihna hi
theihnghilh chi a ni lova, a hla thlir dan mam tak te, hla chuan rilru a hneh
theih nan thu mam leh mawi an hmang tur nia a hria te hian mizo thu leh hla ala
tihlu dawn chauh a, hetiang textual critics \ha tak Mizo ten kan lo nei reng hi
inchhuanna tham tak a ni thei bawk ang.
Heng
a kutchhuak leh a critical works hrang hrang avang hian JF. Laldailova hian
mizo literary criticism ah hmun pawimawh a luah reng dawn a ni.
VIII.
Tlipna
Kan sawi tak ang
hian Mizo ten hawrawp kan neihna la rei lo viau mahsela hnam dang hmasawnna
zarzovin literature lama kan hmasawnna a \hang chak hle a. Criticism lam pawh
literature peng pakhat a nihna hriaiin kan hranghlui ten an lo luhchilh hma em
em a. Heng avang hian hnam vannei kan nih phahin kan thu leh hla hian hmasawnna
tam tak a neih phah a tih theih ang. Chutih rualin hun kal zel hian duhthawhna
a tizual em em a, hei vang hian nakin zelah pawh kan literature peng hrang
hrang hian hma asawn zel a rinawm hle bawk a ni.
Work
Cited :
i)
Darhmingthangi. Zikpuii pa Hnuhma. Aizawl : Mizoram Publication Board, 2000. Print.
ii)
Laldailova, J.F., English-Lushai Dictionary. Aizawl :
Lalrinliana. 2005. Print
iii)
Laldinmawia,H., Literature Lamtluang. Maharashtra :
CreatiVentures, 2015. Print
iv)
Vanchhawng,Lb(Ed)., Lairil. Pachhunga University College
:Aizawl. 2013. Print.
v)
Vannghaka,K.C. Literature Zungzam. Bawngkawn: Vanhlupuii, 2014.
Print.
Bibliography
:
i)
Darhmingthangi. Zikpuii pa Hnuhma. Aizawl : Mizoram Publication Board, 2000. Print.
ii)
Khawlhring, Siamkima.,Prof. Zalenna Ram. Aizawl : Mc.Lalrinthanga.
2002. Print.
iii)
Khiangte, Laltluangliana., Thuhlaril. Mizoram University :College
Text Book. 2006. Print.
iv)
Laldailova,J.F. Bible Thlirna. Electric
Veng : Gilzom. 2012. Print
v)
Laldinmawia,H., Literature Lamtluang. Maharashtra :
CreatiVentures, 2015. Print
vi)
Vannghaka,K.C. Literature Kawngpui. Bawngkawn: Vanhlupuii, 2010.
Print
vii)
Vannghaka,K.C. Literature Zungzam. Bawngkawn: Vanhlupuii, 2014.
Print.
viii)
Vanchhawng,Lb(Ed)., Lairil. Pachhunga University College
:Aizawl. 2013. Print.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete